![]() |
||||
|
|
Quality Status Report 2000
Chapter 3 - Human activities
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Demography
3.3 Conservation
3.4 Tourism and recreation
3.5 Fisheries
3.6 Mariculture (fish and shellfish farming)
3.7 Coastal engineering and land reclamation
3.8 Sand and gravel extraction
3.9 Dredging, dumping and sea-based discharges
3.10 Oil and gas industry
3.11 Shipping
3.12 Coastal industries
3.13 Military activities
3.14 Land-based activities
3.15 Agriculture
3.16 Regulatory measures and future developments
|
This chapter is devoted to the various human activities that influence the coastal and offshore environments of the North-East Atlantic. The changes that are occurring especially to coastal marine ecosystems are largely a function of human intervention and an assessment of these changes needs to be made in relation to those activities that have large-scale and persistent consequences for habitats, biological diversity and productivity. In attempting to assess the causes of environmental change, it is particularly important to understand how these activities (i.e. the sources of change) are themselves changing with time. At present, a balanced description of human activities affecting the marine environment is difficult. Most countries do not routinely compile demographic statistics, and related land-use (industrial and tourist) data, specifically for the coastal zone (e.g. within 10 km of the sea) and trends are therefore difficult to assess accurately. In addition, there is a lack of harmonised data on economic parameters associated with human activities. Although efforts have been made to gather the most readily available data for the current assessment, the information presented is far from balanced and complete and there are considerable disparities between countries and regions. Nevertheless, this chapter gives an indication of the general patterns of the human activities across the maritime area. Many of the coastal states bordering the North-East Atlantic are densely populated, highly industrialised or use land intensively for agriculture. As a consequence, the region is affected by many human activities that result in inputs of nutrients and harmful substances, and the introduction of hazardous substances through rivers, the atmosphere and direct domestic and industrial discharges. The OSPAR countries make use of the seas for fishing activities, offshore oil and gas exploration, the laying of pipelines, extraction of sand and gravel, dumping of dredged material, the laying of cable routes and energy cables and as transport routes. There is growing traffic between European States and other parts of the world, and the North Sea is one of the most frequently traversed sea territories in the world. Many coastal zones are intensively used for recreation. In several regions there is increasing competition for the use of certain facilities and amenities on, or adjacent to, the coasts. There is growing demand for housing, commercial sites, rented accommodation and improved services. There is also an expanding market for clean beaches, watersports, angling, ecotourism and unspoilt coastal landscapes. These interests are not always compatible. Most States in the North-East Atlantic have declared an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), making use of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which distinguishes between three categories:
International conventions and regulations, such as the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) and the London Convention, apply both within and outside of the EEZs. Measures and regulatory framework for the protection of the maritime area against the adverse effects of human activities so as to safeguard human health and to conserve marine ecosystems and, when practicable, restore marine areas which have been adversely affected are described under Section 3.16. Adopted measures concern hazardous substances known for their environmental risk and mentioned in the various OSPAR Strategies, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and heavy metals, radioactive substances and nutrients. Another OSPAR Strategy concerns the protection and conservation of ecosystems and biological diversity of the maritime area. Measures have been adopted to address several industrial sectors and diffuse sources (e.g. inputs of phosphorus and heavy metals have been substantially reduced, but other substances (e.g. nitrogen) have not been substantially reduced). Traffic separation schemes have been established in order to reduce the risk of accidents. Fisheries have been regulated through the application of technical measures and Total Allowable Catches (TACs). The framework for environmental protection of the Convention area has developed extensively during the past twenty years through initiatives by the European Union (EU) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Furthermore, initiatives were taken in accordance with the OSPAR and preceding Oslo and Paris Conventions, and through the Bonn Agreement, the Helsinki Convention, the International Conferences on the Protection of the North Sea and the Trilateral Wadden Sea Conferences. There are no special agreements between East Atlantic and West Atlantic coastal states. The human population in the catchments of the five OSPAR Regions ranges from 240 000 in Region V (Azores only) to 184 million in Region II (Table 3.1). Population densities vary from 2.4 inh/km2 (Iceland, northern Norway, Scottish Highlands) to 381 inh/km2 in the Netherlands (Table 3.1). Populations in coastal areas often show considerable seasonal variation due to tourism. The human population in Regions III, IV and V tend to concentrate in coastal towns creating growing competition and conflict between the exploitation of natural resources, and the consequent development, and the need for nature conservation. The same is also true for Region I, but because of the low population density the pressure on the coast is not nearly as high as in Region II. Population density and land cover in coastal areas are shown in Figure 3.1. The mean annual population growth between 1990 and 1996 recorded in Iceland was 1% and in Norway 0.5%. In 1996 the population in the EU grew by more than 1 million people (0.3%) to a total population of 373 million (Figure 3.2). Since the mid-1980s, immigration has influenced population growth in the EU; approximately 80% of the growth in 1995 was due to immigration. Extrapolating present trends in birth rates, death rates and migration, results in the population of the OSPAR Member States (with exception of Finland, Luxembourg and Switzerland) reaching a maximum of about 312 million in 2025 (Eurostat, 1997). |
![]() |
Figure 3.1 Population density and land cover in coastal areas. Source: EEA (1999). |
![]() |
Figure 3.2 Population change between 1988 and 1996. Source: Statistisches Bundesamt (1995). |
|
3.3.1 Ecological conservation Modifications to coastal areas resulting from human activities have been accompanied by changes to and losses of habitats and ecological disturbance. In recognition of this, OSPAR Contracting Parties are signatories to several international conventions concerning the conservation of coastal and offshore environments, and all OSPAR Contracting Parties have established conservation areas within the framework of international conventions or national regulations (Table 3.2). Some offshore areas and some species (e.g. whales and migratory birds) are also protected by conventions. In 1998, the OSPAR Convention was expanded by a further Annex to include protection and conservation of ecosystems and biological diversity. Both national legislation and EC directives are important instruments in protecting marine ecosystems. Examples are the EC Directive on the conservation of wild birds (79/409/EEC) and the EC Directive on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (92/43/EEC). Within that framework a coherent ecological network of habitats shall be established (NATURA 2000). Additionally, countries have developed a number of national designations. In Iceland and Norway where these EC directives do not apply, nature protection areas are predominantly land-based, although some coastal areas are protected or have been identified for protection. |
![]() |
Table 3.2 International conventions for ecological conservation. |
|
3.3.2 Archaeological conservation Numerous old wrecks and other features of archaeological importance such as ancient tombs and buildings can be found on the coasts of the OSPAR area. They have little significance for the ecology of the area but they are part of its marine heritage, may attract scholars and tourists and are worthy of protection. Examples are the submerged villages off the south-east coast of England and the numerous archaeological remains. Numerous old shipwrecks can be found on the seabed around the coastline of all Regions (3000 off the coast of Northern Ireland alone). Many vessels foundered during the Fifteenth Century in the Azores (800 wrecks) and between the Sixteenth and Nineteenth Centuries around Spain and Portugal. Archaeological remains and shipwrecks are subject to the risks of disturbance and destruction by mineral extraction, navigational dredging, pipe laying and pollution. Special legislation for protecting marine archaeological relics exists in all Regions. The European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (1992; ratified by Norway 1995) regulates sites of cultural heritage significance, both on land and in the sea. Moreover, a draft convention on the underwater cultural heritage is under discussion within the UN system. Coastal areas provide many opportunities for leisure and recreation that attract both local people and tourists from inland and abroad. Camping and bathing, sailing, recreational fishing, surfing, scuba diving and bird- and whale-watching are among the most popular activities. The number of tourists shows a distinctly seasonal pattern. For example, in the Wadden Sea area 75 to 90% of all overnight stays are booked for the period April to October. In several areas the tourist season is increasingly concentrated in the summer months. In all OSPAR Regions tourism has been growing steadily. For example, in Norway the number of overnight stays in hotels increased during the mid-1990s by 20 to 25%. In the Republic of Ireland it is estimated that since the 1970s the number of day trips to the coasts has increased by almost 600%. Tourist accommodation in the Azores has increased by 83% since 1980. Tourists visiting Iceland increased by about 62% over the period 1990 to 1998. The number of car ferries operating in the area and their carrying capacities have been expanding rapidly and these facilitate the tourist trade. In the absence of stringent planning controls and sensitive development policies, the attributes of coastal areas that are most attractive to visitors such as unspoilt landscapes, clean uncrowded beaches, sea water fit for bathing and wildlife refuges, can be harmed by the sheer number of visitors, construction, and excessive vehicle and pedestrian traffic. In the past, bathing water at many coastal sites was contaminated by bacteria and organic material, often as a result of contamination by sewage. As an EC report has shown (Figure 3.3), there has been much improvement recently in bathing water quality primarily through the provision of new or improved wastewater treatment plants. Designated beaches are monitored regularly during the bathing season and the number of beaches complying with the mandatory requirements of the EC Directive (76/160/EEC) is steadily increasing. |
![]() |
Figure 3.3 Bathing Water Directive compliance in EU countries during 1992 to 1998 (percentage of beaches complying with at least the mandatory values of the Directive). Source: after EC (1999). |
|
Fishing has great economic and social importance for most OSPAR countries, and technical developments have led to more efficient exploitation of commercial fish stocks. It is very important that fishing is managed in a sustainable way to avoid overexploitation of the fish stocks and to rebuild those stocks that are believed to be overexploited today. Many target species are now not within their ‘Safe Biological Limits’ (see footnotes to Table 5.1). Fishing also results in the mortality of non-target species and towed fishing gears can impact on benthic communities and cause physical disturbance of the seabed. 3.5.1 Fish The landings of the main commercial fish species are outlined in Figure 3.4 and Table 5.1. Norway and Iceland are among the largest fishing nations in the world, with a yearly catch of 2 600 000 and 1 500 000 – 2 000 000 t, respectively. In the Norwegian Sea the catches from the Russian fleet increased from 440 000 t in 1994 to 1 300 000 t in 1998, mainly due to an increase in landings of herring. In the North Sea at present 30 to 40% of the biomass of commercially exploited fish species is caught each year. The total annual landings in the North Sea (Region II) increased from around 1 million t in 1900 to 2 million t in 1960. During the 1960s the landings increased sharply to about 3.5 million t, followed by a decline to less than 3 million t in recent years; in 1995 landings in the North Sea totalled 2.9 million t, compared to 0.17 million t in the Channel and 0.4 million t in the Kattegat. Over this period, there has been a decrease in the landings of gadoids and an increase in landings of pelagic species and species for industrial processing for fishmeal and oil. Landings from industrial fisheries (mostly sandeels) account for about 55% of the total catch weight in the North Sea. Due to increased beam trawling in the southern and central parts of the area, fishing effort in the North Sea rose between the late 1970s and 1995 when it totalled 2.25 million hours (2 million hours in 1990) (Jennings et al., 1999). In Region III the average yearly landings of fish between 1990 and 1995 were 840 000 t; 75% of which were pelagic species and the remainder demersal. Irish and Scottish fleets account for approximately half the total fish landings in the region. In Region IV, the major fisheries in economic terms are for tuna, the most noteworthy being the albacore (Thunnus alalunga) fishery which extends into Region V ranging from the Bay of Biscay to the Azores (14 000 t), the bluefin (Thunnus thynnus) fishery in the Bay of Biscay (yearly 1000 to 4000 t) and the swordfish (Xiphias gladius) fishery (6000 t in the entire North-East Atlantic). The species yielding the highest landings are sardine (Sardina pilchardus), horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) and mackerel (Scomber scombrus). The fisheries for sardine and anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) are important for the survival of coastal communities. In Region V, fisheries aim at large pelagic tuna and tuna-like fish (mainly in the southern sector), deep-sea species on the continental slopes, and demersal and pelagic stocks (other than tuna and related species) in deep oceanic waters. Artisanal fisheries around the Azores and adjacent seamounts target a great variety of species. An important target species in Region V is Atlantic bluefin tuna with annual catches around 40 000 t. Redfish catches peaked in 1994 and 1995, at 94 000 and 127 000 t, respectively. Catch data are sparse and assessment of the status of the stocks in Region V is severely hampered by insufficient monitoring and reporting. Despite this, assessments have been carried out using total international landings data and the French trawl CPUE (catch per unit effort) data for a range of species. The assessments support the view expressed by ICES in 1998, that most deep-water species are currently harvested outside safe biological limits. Fishing effort in the deeper waters tends to be unpredictable, since it waxes and wanes according to the fluctuations experienced by fishermen as their access to other stocks is limited by regulation or overfishing. Fleets and gear types In most Regions the coastal fishing fleets consist mainly of smaller fishing vessels. Additionally, many OSPAR countries have deep sea fishing fleets (e.g. longliners, industrial and factory trawlers). Many nations operate within Region V, including a number of fleets from non-OSPAR countries (e.g. in 1996 282 Japanese longliners operated in the Atlantic Ocean). In the northern part of Region V, the primary fishery is trawling for redfish. In the North Sea, the capacity of demersal and pelagic fleets was enhanced rapidly after the Second World War. Larger ships with more powerful engines came into operation. Three types of modern fishing vessel are responsible for the majority of the landings: purse seiners for the substantial exploitation of herring (Clupea harengus) and mackerel; from the early 1950s otter trawlers started targeting herring, cod (Gadus morhua), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), saithe (Pollachius virens) and subsequently small demersal and pelagic species, notably sandeel (Ammodytes spp.), Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarki) and sprat (Sprattus sprattus) for the fishmeal and oil industry; the beam trawlers targeting flatfish. The gear types used are:
Some gear types used in North Sea fisheries in relation to target species and by-catch are listed in Table 3.3, and the by-catch of some marine mammals owing to fishing activities is shown in Table 3.4. |
![]() |
Figure 3.4 Landings of the commercially important fish species in 1997. |
![]() |
Table 3.4 By-catch numbers of some marine mammals owing to fishing activities on a species and gear type basis for the OSPAR Regions. Source: after ICES (1998). |
|
Discards In Icelandic and Norwegian waters, regulations prohibit the discarding of commercially important fish. Fleets subject to EU regulation are obliged to discard undersized fish. Commercial sized fish may also be discarded when catches are in excess of the quota or to maximise economic returns from the catch (high grading). Many discarded organisms die. Discarding of young fish is considerable on inshore nursery grounds as well as in the mixed roundfish fisheries. The levels of discarding vary largely by species, areas, fleet and season. In Region II, the estimated average percentage of cod and haddock discarded in North Sea demersal fisheries are 22% and 36% respectively by weight and 51% and 49% by numbers (5NSC, 1997). In the beam trawl fishery, approximately half the numbers of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) caught are discarded, although on inshore grounds this may be as high as 80%. In 1996, estimates from one of the demersal fleets operating in Region III indicated that about 18%, by weight, of the total catch was discarded. However, this is considered to be a conservative estimate of the extent of discarding. In Nephrops fisheries, just under half a tonne of whiting (Merlangius merlangus) is discarded for every tonne of Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) landed from the Irish Sea. Within Regions III and IV, the discarding of pelagic species is generally below 25% of the total weight caught by trawl gears. There is a lack of reliable information on discards by purse seiners. Occasionally whole catches may be discarded because they are under the marketable size. Demersal and pelagic fisheries in Region V have been expanding rapidly. Only in a few cases have by-catch and discard rates been studied, indicating that weights of discards often equal the weights of the fish that have landed. 3.5.2 Shellfish (crustaceans and molluscs) Landings of shellfish are listed in Table 3.5. The most common methods employed in directed fisheries for shellfish are dredges (mechanical for scallops, oysters and blue mussel (Mytilus edulis), and suction for cockle (Cerastoderma edule)), trawls for Norway lobster and shrimp, and pots for Norway lobster, edible crab (Cancer pagurus) and lobster (Homarus gammarus). In all Regions the largest landings by weight originate from the fisheries for shrimp, mussel and cockle (Table 3.5). Outside the Arctic and Wider Atlantic regions the major commercial crustacean is the Norway lobster, which is caught by trawl and pots on muddy ground in a range of locations in coastal waters, near seas, and along the western shelf. Potting for edible crab has also been increasing in the Channel, Western Approaches and off the Irish–Scottish west coast. Potting for lobsters remains locally important in many coastal areas but fishing is gradually spreading further offshore. Landings from the brown shrimp (Crangon crangon) fisheries show substantial natural fluctuations year on year, but landings from the other crustacean fisheries are more stable, although most of the stocks are fairly heavily exploited. In addition to the large-volume mollusc fisheries for mussel and cockle, fishing effort has been increasing steadily in many great scallop (Pecten maximus) and queen scallop (Chlamys opercularis) fisheries. New fisheries are also being developed for whelk (Buccinum undatum), razor clams (Ensis directus) and Spisula sp. Most mollusc stocks are heavily exploited, and some scallop and cockle fisheries are giving rise to management concerns. Mollusc stocks invariably show substantial natural variations in recruitment, which contribute to the difficulties in assessment and fishery management. |
![]() |
Table 3.5 Landings or catches of the main crustacean and mollusc species. |
|
3.5.3 Seaweed The harvesting of seaweed (algae) for use in alginate and fertiliser production, and occasionally for pharmaceutical use, is a significant industry along parts of the coastlines of Regions I, II and III. The main species harvested are knotted wrack (Ascophyllum nodosum) and kelp (Laminaria hyperboria, L. digitata). Typical quantities of algae harvested annually in recent years are on average 180 000 t in Norway, 72 000 t in France, 40 000 t in Ireland and 12 500 t in Iceland. 3.5.4 Fisheries management The overall objective of fisheries management is to ensure sustainable use of fish resources. Management of the fisheries in the OSPAR Convention area is regulated within EU waters under the EU Common Fisheries Policy, and within Faroese, Icelandic and Norwegian waters by national policy and legislation. There is a general overcapacity in most of the fleets fishing in the OSPAR area. The EU and the Icelandic and Norwegian authorities have implemented measures intended to decrease the fishing effort by special programmes. In the EU fleet the reduction has been compensated for by an increase in efficiency, with the result that no reduction in fishing pressure is achieved (5NSC, 1997). The Northeast Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) aims at promoting conservation and optimal utilisation of straddling fish stocks in the North-East Atlantic area. For the North Sea, the Intermediate Ministerial Meeting on the Integration of Fisheries and Environmental Issues held in 1997 (IMM 1997) recognised problems to achieve agreed goals and requested the development and application of an ecosystem approach to the management and protection of the North Sea. The International Commission on Conservation of Atlantic Tuna (ICCAT) is responsible for the international management of the fisheries of large pelagic tuna and tuna-like fish. A wide range of national conservation measures have been introduced to protect vulnerable life stages of different stocks, including permanent inshore nursery areas, temporary closures to protect juvenile fish and spawning area closures at peak spawning times of the year. A 12 nautical mile coastal limit to exclude large trawlers is in place in most regions and technical conservation measures such as mesh sizes and sorting grids are widely used to reduce the capture of juvenile fish. Other measures have been aimed at restricting effort through licensing schemes and days at sea limitations. The main tools at present agreed upon in fisheries (fish and shellfish) management are:
The most widely used tool in fisheries management is the yearly setting of TACs. This is done both on national bases, by international fora (e.g. NEAFC, ICCAT) and by the EU based on advice from ICES. The advice from ICES is intended to provide a precautionary approach to fisheries management. As a means to achieve this, ICES has suggested precautionary reference points for spawning stock biomass and fishing mortality. However, these precautionary levels are relevant for single stocks and may not be considered as being precautionary with respect to multi-species interactions nor to wider ecosystem effects. In the management of fisheries resources, social and economic considerations also need to be taken into account. International TACs, and national allocations within the TACs, are agreed for the main commercial fish stocks and also for Norway lobster, northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) and other shellfish. The accuracy of annual stock assessments and TACs depends upon good quality catch data. Illegal landings and unrecorded discards undermine the accuracy of stock assessments and thus the TACs. Programmes to monitor fisheries for discards have been implemented in only some fisheries and usually only in very recent years. Few data from these programmes have yet been provided for use in assessing stocks. Technical measures are designed to control aspects of the fishery such as mesh size, net geometry, minimum landing size, by-catch limits, closed seasons and closed areas. Enforcement is a national responsibility and is assisted by, for example, vessel inventories and licences, logbook regulations and satellite monitoring. At European Community level, a revised package of technical measures came into force EU-wide on 1 January 2000. These are designed to improve selectivity and thereby reduce discards, and include the mandatory introduction of square mesh panels into certain nets, limitations on twine and rules on gear construction. In addition, specific controls were introduced to deal with the problem of cetacean by-catch; and as from 1 January 2002 the use of high seas drift nets to catch tuna and other species will be prohibited. From 1992 to 1996 the EU Multi-Annual Guidance Programme (MAGP III) aimed at reducing the capacity of fleets by reducing tonnage and engine power used catching roundfish by 20% and fleets targeting flatfish by 15%. In a report in 1997 the European Commission noted that the implementation of the MAGP III was successful as regards restructuring the fleets (EC, 1997). Between 1991 and 1996 the EU fleet tonnage and engine power were reduced by more than 10% (Figure 3.5). Although fleets have been reduced, the North Sea IMM 1997 criticised that ‘the reduction has been compensated for by an increase in efficiency, with the result that no reduction in fishing pressure has been achieved’. On account of this, the European Commission adopted MAGP IV for the period 1997 to 2001, aiming to reduce the fishing effort by up to 30% on stocks considered to be outside safe biological limits. In 1998, Norway introduced a decommissioning scheme for coastal vessels, similar to that for purse seiners in 1996. Other regulations were aimed at prohibiting access of new trawlers to the shrimp fisheries. Norway has halved the number of vessels from 26 642 (in 1982) to 13 251 (in 1998) while the engine power (1 136 178 KW in 1982 and 1 236 989 KW in 1998) and the gross tonnage (295 925 t in 1982 and 275 524 t in 1998) have remained nearly constant. In Iceland, the fisheries management system was introduced with the view to making sure that active fishing capacity does not surpass the carrying capacity of the commercially exploited stocks. This is achieved by the use of Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs). Every year, based on rigid scientific assessment and prognosis, a TAC is established for nearly all the species that are fished on a commercial basis. To ensure that the TAC is not surpassed, while maximising the economic efficiency of the fishing operations, the Government of Iceland extended in 1990 the ITQs system introduced in 1984, to cover all the commercial species. At the beginning of each fishing year the TAC for individual species is divided between all the fishing vessels which hold a quota share for the species concerned. The quotas are divisible and transferable, which affords the fishing operations the necessary flexibility to maximise their economic return from limited catch. Thanks to the fisheries management system, the active fishing capacity in Iceland has reduced, whether considering the number of fishing vessels, the value of the fishing fleet or the tonnage. For instance there was close to a 38% reduction in demersal fishing efforts in the period from 1984 to 1997. Shellfish fisheries are under national management in Iceland and Norway; in the EU area these fisheries are not completely EU-regulated because of the localised nature of the stocks. Existing regulations are directed at the restriction of fishing techniques, a reduction in fishing effort (absolute or by temporal or spatial restrictions) as well as minimum landing size or a combination of these practices (OSPAR, 1998a). Norway lobster and northern prawn fisheries are, however, regulated by TACs. |
![]() |
Figure 3.5 Implementation of EU
MAGP III (1992 to the end of 1996): (a) reduction of engine power of fishing fleets, (b) reduction of gross tonnage of fishing fleets. |
![]() |
Table 3.6 Marine aquaculture production in 1997 (tonnes) within the OSPAR area and the Baltic Sea. Source: national data; FAO (1999). |
![]() |
Figure 3.6 Aquaculture production in the Atlantic area. Source: FAO |
![]() |
Table 3.7 Sand and gravel extraction 1992 to 1997. Source: national data; OSPAR (1998b,c). |
![]() |
Table 3.8 Summary of amounts of wastes dumped at sea in 1996 (tonnes dry weight). Source: national data; OSPAR (1999b). |
|
3.9.2 Sewage sludge The disposal of sewage sludge at sea, which ceased at the end of 1998 by agreement of the OSPAR Contracting Parties, was practised only in Regions II and III. Germany ceased the practice in 1981, Ireland early in 1999 and the UK in 1998 (see Table 3.8). 3.9.3 Industrial waste The dumping of industrial wastes was phased out in 1993 when the last few licences for disposal at sea of liquid industrial waste and fly ash from the UK expired. Incineration of liquid industrial waste on special incinerator vessels in the North Sea was terminated in 1991. The dumping of waste from the titanium dioxide (TiO2 ) industry was terminated in the North Sea in 1989 and by Spain in 1993. Discharges from the TiO2 industry are permitted under OSPAR and EU regulation and are mainly confined to French and UK estuarine waters (Seine, Humber and Tees). 3.9.4 Radioactive waste Since 1983, there has been a global moratorium on radioactive waste disposal within the framework of the London Convention. The OSPAR Convention 1992 contains a legally binding ban for such dumpings, which is now accepted by all Contracting Parties. Before 1967, sea-disposal of radioactive wastes was uncoordinated and a number of shallow sites were used for the disposal of relatively small amounts of wastes. After 1967, its disposal was done in deeper waters and co-ordinated by the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). The wastes consisted mostly of low-level materials mostly from nuclear plant operations, fuel fabrication and reprocessing, radionuclide use in medicine, research and industry, and decontamination of redundant plant and equipment. A report on the main dumpsite (OECD, 1985) concluded that it posed negligible human radiological risk. However, in the absence of baseline data on the benthic biology, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the environmental impacts. In 1995, the OECD/NEA finalised its Co-ordinated Research and Environmental Surveillance Programme related to Sea Disposal of Radioactive Waste (CRESP), and summarised the results in the CRESP Final Report 1981 – 1995 (OECD, 1996). While this programme collected new biological information for a radiological assessment of dumping, none of these new data radically changed the conclusions of the last main site suitability review (OECD, 1985). Several OSPAR Contracting Parties expressed concern that the surveillance of the former radioactive dumpsite was terminated. 3.9.5 Inert materials of natural origin Dumping of inert material of natural origin (such as mine stone) has been carried out only in Ireland. Some inert material is deposited onto the foreshore in the UK and Norway, but such deposits from land do not constitute dumping under the OSPAR Convention. 3.9.6 Other waste The dumping of ships in the OSPAR maritime area will be prohibited from 2005. In 1996 Norway dumped eighteen mostly wooden fishing vessels. Dumping of iron/steel hulled vessels is now forbidden in Norway. During the First and Second World Wars, numerous vessels were sunk in the Atlantic and in some Regions, in the post-war periods, large quantities of redundant munitions were dumped at sea. 3.9.7 Discharges from offshore installations Offshore installations are significant sources for the input of oil to the maritime area, especially in Region II. Variations in oil discharges are shown in Figure 3.7 (not taking into account synthetic muds, which fall into a different category). Overall, inputs of oil have decreased from a maximum of about 28 300 t in 1985 to about 9500 t in 1997 (-66%). This reduction was mainly achieved by decreasing the amount of oil discharged via cuttings from about 25 800 t to about 6000 t in 1996 after which only synthetic fluid muds have been used (discharge via cuttings in 1997: 7200 t). During the period 1985 to 1997, the discharge of oil with production water increased from about 2500 t to about 8500 t. This rise is due to the increased number of installations and increasing amounts of production water associated with progressive exploitation of the oil fields. Heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and production chemicals are, together with oil, discharged via produced water. These inputs increase with increasing age of the field. The amount of discharged produced water can be reduced by for example re-injection into the reservoir or by downhole separation, which is largely experimental at present. Operational discharges of water-based and synthetic drilling muds are strictly regulated. In 1996, OSPAR adopted Decision 96/3 on a Harmonised Mandatory Control System for the Use and Reduction of the Discharge of Offshore Chemicals. This Decision is a key element in the control of chemicals intended for use on offshore installations. Following a trial period its effectiveness was reviewed in the light of experience and a package of new OSPAR measures was established. These were adopted in June 2000 and supersede the previous OSPAR measures with respect to offshore chemicals. Water-based muds, oil-based muds (OBMs) and, more recently, synthetic fluid muds have been, and in some cases still are being, used when drilling wells. With the exception of geological or safety reasons, the use of oil-based muds is prohibited in the upper part of the well. Cleaned cuttings contaminated with drilling fluid may be discharged to the sea. Since the end of 1996 they must comply with the target standard for oil on cuttings of 10 g/kg dry cuttings (previously 100 g/kg). Ministers at the Fourth International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea invited OSPAR to ban (with certain exceptions) the discharge of oil contaminated cuttings by 1997. Since then only cuttings contaminated with water-based and synthetic fluids have been discharged. As some synthetic fluids were found to possess properties that could result in adverse impacts on benthic communities, the UK industry undertook a voluntary agreement to phase them out by 2000. Following a review within OSPAR of measures relating to cuttings contaminated with organic-phase drilling fluids, a new comprehensive Decision was adopted in June 2000 (OSPAR Decision 2000/3 (contaminated cuttings)), which rules out discharges of such cuttings except, in exceptional circumstances, those contaminated with synthetic fluids. |
![]() |
Figure 3.7 Total discharges of oil (tonnes) from offshore installations to the OSPAR area. Source: OSPAR (1999a). |
|
3.9.8 Litter Despite pertinent laws and regulations, litter is still a considerable problem for the marine environment and the coastal communities around the whole OSPAR area. Potential sources of litter are mainly related to waste generated by shipping (fishing and commercial) and tourist and recreational activities. The use of plastics and other synthetic materials has increased exponentially. Non-degradable plastic constitutes 95% of the total amount of litter in many parts of the OSPAR area. Marine sources include shipping, fishing and mariculture operations, and land-based sources include coastal landfill sites, sewage discharges and beach recreation. On many beaches discarded drink containers (bottles and cans) are a growing component of the litter problem. Whereas the recreation and commercial fishing sectors are likely to be most affected economically by litter, it is also a hazard to wildlife. Drifting fishing nets and ropes may foul ship propellers, lead to entanglement and drowning of mammals and seabirds, and carry epiphytic organisms beyond their normal ranges. The feeding of seabirds, particularly fulmars (Fulmarus sp.) (NSTF, 1993), can be harmed through ingestion of small plastic particles. Litter also reduces the value of fishing products since catches containing hazardous objects (e.g. glass) may have to be discarded. In Region II it was roughly estimated that annually at least 70 000 m3 of litter were thrown overboard in the North Sea (OSPAR, 1997). Estimates of litter resting on the seabed are at least 600 000 m3 , based on a Dutch investigation. In Region III, one study to quantify the scale of the litter problem was undertaken in the Minch off the Scottish west coast. The results suggest that quantities of litter on beaches have increased over the last ten years and that the main sources were fishing, shipping, aqua-culture and tipping. The North Sea (1991) and the Baltic Sea (1988) have been designated as MARPOL Special Areas (Annex V) to prohibit dumping of garbage and litter from ships. However, the situation with regard to litter seems not to have improved (OSPAR, 1997). In Region IV, significant quantities of floating litter have been observed by air far to the west of the coastal Bay of Biscay, several hundred kilometres from the shore. In the Bay of Biscay, fieldwork carried out since 1992 shows that between the surface and 200 m, there are at least 50 million individual items of litter, for areas of greater depth (1800 m, canyons off Cap Breton and Cap Ferret), debris concentrations are around 15 items/ha. Refineries within the Convention area are located mainly in coastal areas or on large rivers. Their effluents are a source of oil and other substances. There have been many rationalisations and environmental improvements in this sector. This is reflected in the large reduction in the quantities of oil discharged. There are substantial offshore oil and gas activities in the OSPAR area (Table 3.9). Figure 3.8 gives the number of installations in the OSPAR area. There is believed to be considerable scope for expansion in the future. In Region V offshore exploration is at an early stage of development. Environmental problems associated with discharges of oil (Figure 3.7), heavy metals and PAHs are dealt with under Section 3.9.7 and in Chapter 4. Generally, improvements in environmental performance relating to the offshore oil and gas sector will be addressed through the OSPAR Strategy on Environmental Goals and Management Mechanisms for Offshore Activities agreed in 1999. In Region I oil and gas production takes place at several fields along the Norwegian coast. Oil exploration occurs both in the Russian and the Norwegian sectors of the Barents Sea. Some of the worlds biggest offshore gas reserves have been found at the Shockmanov and Murmansk fields but production is difficult and expensive because of seasonal ice cover. Very big oil reserves have been discovered close to the shore in the Pechora area. In the Norwegian part of the Barents Sea some larger gas reserves are found. In Region II the major developments of offshore oil industry have been in the northern North Sea, in the UK and Norwegian sectors. Gas fields are exploited mainly in the shallower southern regions in the UK, Dutch and Danish sectors, as well as in Norwegian waters. Between 1990/2 and 1996 the number of offshore platforms and oil production have almost doubled, primarily reflecting increased activity in the Norwegian and UK sectors. In Region III offshore gas production started in 1985. The Kinsale Head Gas Field and Ballycotton Field reserves are expected to last no more than about ten years. Exploration drilling continues in the Irish Sea, Celtic Sea and Bristol Channel. Oil was found in 1990 in the UK Douglas Field in Liverpool Bay. Following discoveries of oil west of Shetland and the development of the technology required to exploit such deep water areas there has been renewed interest in exploration off Scotland, west of the Hebrides. Oil exploration and production activities continue to expand into previously unexploited areas (Rockall, west of the Shetland Islands etc.). In Region IV on the Spanish Atlantic coast, oil rigs and production wells are found off the Basque coast and used for storing gas; gas production wells are situated in the Gulf of Cadiz. Considering an initiative of the Fourth International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (1995), the 1998 Ministerial Meeting of the OSPAR Commission adopted Decision 98/3 on the Disposal of Offshore Installations prohibiting the dumping and the leaving wholly or partly in place of disused offshore installation within the marine area. Subject to assessment and consultation under agreed procedures, derogations are possible for the footings of steel installations weighing more than 10 000 t and for concrete installations. |
![]() |
Table 3.9 Oil and gas production in the OSPAR area in 1998. Source: regional QSRs; national data; BP and AMOCO (via www.bpamoco.com). |
![]() |
Figure 3.8 Total number of offshore installations in the OSPAR area. |
|
Commercial shipping, its navigational requirements and land-based facilities, have various impacts on the marine environment. These include large-scale coastal development for port facilities, the dredging and disposal of sediments, the transfer of non-indigenous species through ships’ ballast water and hull fouling, and the operational, accidental, and occasionally illegal, release of oil. In addition, shipping causes inputs of hazardous substances through the cleaning of tanks, the burning of fuel containing waste products, losses of antifoulants containing biocides, releases of wastewater and garbage, and the loss of cargo and dumping of litter. Along the old Atlantic shipping routes, the seabed is littered with large amounts of clinker from coal-fired vessels. Plastic litter and tar balls commonly occur at the surface, particularly in shipping lanes, and these may affect coastal resources and seabirds. Additional environmental effects of shipping include air pollution through the release of for example sulphuric (SOx ) and nitrous (NOx ) oxides. The increasing use of so-called High Speed Craft increases fuel consumption and thus the release of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2 ). In the whole OSPAR maritime area, discharges of oil from bilges and engine room spaces of ships should, in accordance with the rules, not give rise to visible oil at the sea surface. Under the name North West European Waters, the North Sea, and the seas around Ireland and their approaches have received the status of a Special Area under MARPOL Annex I (oil) as from 1 August 1999; that means that the discharge of oily cargo residues into the sea from any oil tanker is prohibited. Limits for bilge water from machinery space remain 15 ppm, although a Special Area demands modern oily water separation equipment. Slicks do occur when ships fail to observe the rules concerning discharge rates. Within the IMO, a mechanism for a general ban on the use of organotin compounds in antifouling paints has been decided. The target is to prohibit their application from 2003 and to require the removal of tributyltin (TBT) from ships’ hulls by the year 2008. Given the serious effects of TBT on snail and bivalve populations, effective implementation of this measure is required. Within the EC, the control on other TBT applications has been increased with the revision of Council Directive 76/769/EEC. Also within the IMO framework, traffic separation schemes have been introduced to reduce the risk of accidents and activities are ongoing to reduce air pollution by emissions from ships. 3.11.1 Traffic and cargo Ocean transportation grows as world trade expands. Large bulk carriers convey increasing quantities of raw materials. In the decade to 1995, the worldwide transportation of crude oil increased by 61% in tonnage and 86% in tonne-miles. Of the 1415 million t of crude oil transported by sea worldwide about 26% (374 million t) were either destined for, or came from north-western Europe (Figure 3.9). Sea-borne trade in iron ore, coal, grain, bauxite and alumina, and phosphates also increased by an average of 2.6% per annum during the same decade. Of the 402 million t of iron ore carried by ships, about 31% (125 million t) passed through the OSPAR area (Figure 3.9). There was an increase of 59% in coal shipments. Container traffic is also increasing. As an example, by 2020 the port of Rotterdam is expected to handle 20 million containers each year. The maximum size of container vessels continues to grow (now up to 7000 containers). Losses of containers in bad weather are quite frequent and recovery of hazardous cargoes from deep water is often impossible. In the main ports of Regions II, III and IV there is an estimated 500 000 vessel movements annually. Most of Europe’s largest ports are on North Sea coasts and rivers, the largest being Rotterdam/Europoort. The North Sea contains some of the busiest shipping routes in the world. In some areas shipping activity consists to a large extent of regional and local traffic such as ferries, and roll-on/ roll-off vessels on fixed routes. There is little cargo traffic in the Arctic. |
![]() |
Figure 3.9 Shipments of crude oil and iron ore through the OSPAR area in 1997. Source: Fearnleys (1998). |
|
3.11.2 Accidents Depending on the location and the types and amounts of substances released, maritime accidents may result in harmful effects to marine life and occasionally to humans. Accident probability depends strongly on shipping density – so in the open ocean accidents are less frequent and tend to have less impact than those nearer shore. Unintentional pollution at sea has a number of causes: explosions, collisions, groundings, ship damage and breakdowns. One source (Quell and Klimsa, 1997) recorded eighteen accidents in 1994, and a further thirteen in 1995, involving pollution of sea water in the OSPAR area, more than half in the North Sea. Some of the more notable accidents in the last decade are listed in Table 3.10. |
![]() |
Table 3.10 Major shipping accidents since 1992. |
|
Industries tend to be grouped together in places that combine a series of facilities: transport, communication, energy and water supplies etc. Thus, many of the major industrial centres in coastal states of the North-East Atlantic are located along estuaries and close to the main cities and ports. Some of the larger industries to be found at such locations include: metal and metal-processing; smelters; chemical, petrochemical and paper-making plants; oil refineries; gas terminals; vehicle factories; shipbuilding; power stations; and fish processing (Figure 3.10). Coastal habitats have been, and continue to be, altered, disturbed or destroyed by industrial development. Other environmental impacts arise as a result of discharges, emissions and losses to land, air and water. Several estuaries are under considerable pressure from industrial pollution as a result of paper-milling, petroleum refining, production of chlorine, titanium dioxide and surface coatings, iron and steel working, metal fabrication and other heavy industries. Many of these industries use water in large quantities for cooling, rinsing and cleaning. Some nuclear power plants and the French and UK reprocessing plants can be considered as coastal industries discharging heat and radioactive substances into the marine environment. OSPAR reports show that the discharges of most facilities are much lower than those permitted. In their Sintra Statement, OSPAR Ministers agreed to ‘ensure that discharges, emissions and losses of radioactive substances are reduced by the year 2020 to levels where the additional concentrations in the marine environment above historic levels, resulting from such discharges, emissions and losses, are close to zero’. |
![]() |
Figure 3.10 Simplified overview of industry located near the coast of the OSPAR area. |
|
In peacetime, military operations constitute only a small part of sea-borne and coastal activity. They include port activities, construction and upkeep of the fleet, underwater disposal of weapons and munitions, and manoeuvres and firing exercises. Firing exercises are held within clearly identified zones. Military activities can lead to disturbance of wildlife and interfere with other uses of the areas involved. At the end of the First and Second World Wars in most of the Regions considerable quantities of arms and munitions were dumped at sea including considerable quantities of chemical warfare materials (mustard gas, tear gas, nerve gas, tabun, chloroacetophenone, different arsenic-containing compounds (and other agents)). Usually the material was disposed at sites with some distance from land. An exception was the use of the deep trough in the North Channel between Northern Ireland and Scotland. From time to time items (mainly phosphorus incendiary devices) are washed up and present a hazard to beach users. In the wider Atlantic during the Second World War some 20 million t of shipping were sunk. The seabed along the western European continental margin is littered with items ranging from sunken vessels, some nuclear or armed with nuclear devices, to munitions and pyrotechnics used in exercises, to hydrophone arrays (still operational). Land-based activities such as agriculture, industry and households have enormous impact on the marine ecosystem via riverine or atmospheric inputs of nutrients and contaminants; their quantification is often incomplete and tentative. Environmental policy has resulted in measures to reduce inputs of nutrients and contaminants. For example, the reductions in nutrient inputs were mainly achieved by improvements at point sources such as sewage plants for phosphorus and farm waste discharges for nitrogen compounds. However, little success is reported in reducing inputs from diffuse sources where the main problems occur from flushing of fertilisers from arable land, volatilisation, and leakage of industrial and municipal waste deposits. The ban on certain persistent organochlorine compounds in OSPAR countries such as PCBs, hexa-chlorobenzene (HCB), lindane and DDT has been beneficial to the marine environment. Anthropogenic sources of some contaminants are listed in Table 4.1. In the chlor-alkali industry, reduction in mercury discharges has been achieved by applying Best Available Techniques (BAT) and BEP measures. In certain products mercury was replaced by less hazardous substances. The discharges of mercury from dentistry were also reduced. The (non)-ferrous metals and fertiliser industry minimised cadmium discharges and further reductions have been achieved through the substitution of cadmium by less harmful elements. Efficient flue gas treatment has reduced atmospheric emissions of cadmium, mercury and dioxins. The enhanced use of unleaded fuel caused a significant decline in lead release to the environment. Less progress has been made with respect to some other substances (e.g. PAHs and dioxins) identified by the OSPAR Commission for priority action (Annex 2 of the Strategy with Regard to Hazardous Substances). Efforts have been made toward the collection of urban and industrial wastewater and the application of appropriate levels of treatment. Nevertheless, even if households and industries are served by tertiary treatment, exceptional rainfall or tourism during the summer could reduce the efficiency of these systems. Measures were adopted by the Paris Commission in relation to the reduction in nutrient inputs (PARCOM Recommendations 88/2 and 89/4). The EC Directive on Urban WasteWater Treatment (91/271/EEC) provides for the required level of treatment for wastewater. The deadlines for this application are from 31 December 1998 to 31 December 2005, depending on the size of the population, its agglomeration and the sensitivity of the surface waters. The proportion of the population connected to sewage treatment ranges approximately from 80 – 98%. There are extensive areas of agricultural land in Regions II, III and IV. Farmland accounts for more than 42% of the total land in Europe, although the proportion varies from less than 10% to over 70% between countries. In Region I – with only 1 % to 3% cultivated land – forest-based industries dominate; by far the largest resources of wood in the European Arctic are in Russia. Agriculture results in inputs and emissions of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen compounds) and pesticides (e.g. atrazine, carbofuran, triphenyltin (TPT), lindane, DDT, aldrin and dieldrin). There are considerable environmental impacts in certain areas; the main types of pollution are from nitrates, phosphates, ammonia, methane, pesticides (Figure 3.11), and run-off of silage and slurry. Losses of nitrogen and phosphorus contribute to eutrophication of coastal waters. Atmospheric emissions from agriculture are a source of contaminants (e.g. ammonia and pesticides) in the deep ocean and atmosphere (e.g. methane). The EC Directive on the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (91/676/EEC) provides for the establishment of codes of good agricultural practice, for the designation of vulnerable zones and for action programmes to reduce pollution by nitrates. The highly productive agricultural systems in Western Europe fall into two broad categories. Firstly, there are areas of intensive field-crop farming, dominated by large holdings; secondly, there are areas of very intensive agriculture specialising in animal production and/or fruit and vegetable farming. The OSPAR Strategy to Combat Eutrophication includes a commitment to source-oriented approaches, including the promotion of good agricultural practice and ecological agriculture. |
![]() |
Figure 3.11 Total pesticides used in agriculture. Source: Eurostat (1998). |
Back to top || Back to QSR home page || Table of contents || Chapter 1 || Chapter 2 || Chapter 4 || Chapter 5 || Chapter 6 || Appendices
| © Copyright OSPAR Commission 2004 - All rights Reserved |
|