Economic & Social Anaylsis
A main strategic direction given in the OSPAR thematic strategy on biological diversity and ecosystems is the further development and implementation of tools such as marine spatial planning, impact assessment and socio-economic assessment, in order to achieve the reduction in pressures which are adversely affecting the marine environment, and the sustainable use of ecosystem goods and services. The need for the re-establishment of the OSPAR group on economic and social analysis arose from the recognition by OSPAR Contracting Parties that the (by that time) forthcoming Intermediate Assessment in 2017 and the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive initial assessment would benefit from a more coherent economic description of the marine environment at OSPAR level.
Economic description of the use of the marine environment
One of the first tasks that the OSPAR group on economic and social analysis took up was to put together information on the economic description of the use of the marine environment. This was done by collecting statistical information from the various Contracting Parties on Gross Value Added, the number of employed persons, and past development in production value, for Fisheries and aquaculture, Shipping, Ports, Oil and Gas, and Offshore Wind Energy. For those statistical data, most Contracting Parties use Eurostat definitions. This renders at least some level of coherency.
Another part of the economic description of the use of the marine environment was a description of the expected future trends in the various economic sectors. Also here information was collected from the various Contracting Parties. However, since there are no international guidelines on how to present information on the expected economic trends, there is less coherence in the analyses. Nevertheless, it appeared possible to agree on a short summary with some high level texts on expected future trends in the OSPAR region.
All this information was ultimately presented in the economic chapter in the Intermediate Assessment and will be used as input into the 2023 Quality Status Report.
In the above-mentioned economic chapter of the Intermediate Assessment, the focus was first on those economic sectors for which it would probably be relatively easy to collect more or less coherent economic data, as these are uniformly defined by NACE codes (shipping, fisheries, etc.). ‘Recreation and tourism’ is not a separate economic sector in Eurostat statistics (no NACE code), but it is an important activity that has a significant link with the marine environment, both as a user (enjoying good environmental quality), but also as a pressure (e.g. source of marine litter, disturbance of animals). Therefore, a separate report was produced focusing on the size and trends and developments in recreation and tourism in the OSPAR area [link to Noordzeeloket; will be added later].
Ecosystem services and natural capital
Another work stream is the development of approaches to analyze ecosystem services and natural capital. An important driver for the implementation of the concept of ecosystem services is OSPAR’s North East Atlantic Environment Strategy, which has implementing the ecosystem approach as one of its main objectives. The Strategy commits OSPAR countries to continue to progressively implement the Ecosystem Approach to the management of human activities in order to reduce impacts on the marine environment, taking into account all pressures from human activities on the marine environment. One of the main strategic directions under this objective is to develop methodologies, including social and economic analysis of the use of the OSPAR Maritime Area, to support evaluations of whether the North-East Atlantic Ocean is used sustainably. Ecosystem goods and services is one such approach that OSPAR group on economic and social analysis is analyzing and testing in a regional context[PS1] .
The first step was to organize a workshop in which various Contracting Parties and (international) organizations presented what they were doing in this field, and discussions took place on the potential contribution to the OSPAR processes of the various approaches that were presented.
As a follow up of this workshop the OSPAR group on economic and social analysis supervised the preparation of a report on possibilities of application of Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital approaches in OSPAR activities [link to Noordzeeloket; will be added later]. According to this report, there is no one single best approach for OSPAR, but the most applicable method depends on the question to be answered.
The first question after the publication of this report was ‘What is the impact of cumulative ecological effects in terms of ecosystem services due to the increase in offshore windfarms in the North-East Atlantic on economic sectors in OSPAR countries?’. This was the first application of an analysis of ecosystem services at the OSPAR level. Therefore, one of the aims of this report was also to determine whether the concept of ecosystem services is useful to support decision-making in OSPAR activities. [link to Noordzeeloket; will be added later]
Exchange of information on costs and benefits of measures and economic analyses
One of the standard economic analyses is cost benefit analysis. Most Contracting Parties have economists who know how they should perform those analyses, however, when applying the standard theory in the practice of environmental measures in the OSPAR area, it appears that there are quite some challenges. An important one is lack of data on costs of potential measures, but also lack of knowledge on cause-effect chains, making it difficult if not impossible to perform cost benefit analyses according to the textbooks. In those cases one might have to look for alternative approaches. Therefore, another activity of the OSPAR group on economic and social analysis is to exchange information on costs and benefits of various measures and approaches used in the economic analyses.
According to the OSPAR Intermediate Assessment, the number of MPAs is increasing. Since assessing the benefits of measures is always a challenge a study is undertaken to estimate the potential benefits of designating MPAs [link to Noordzeeloket; will be added later].
Since OSPAR is working on a regional action plan on Marine Litter the OSPAR group on economic and social analysis has made an inventory of how the various Contracting Parties have been presenting benefits of reducing marine litter. The Contracting Parties were asked how they have done the analyses, and this information was put into a document which was then shared among the economists, but also with the OSPAR groups dealing with marine litter issues. This collection (and exchange) of experiences and information was very helpful for the OSPAR group that is working on marine litter. Therefore, the OSPAR group on economic and social analysis has produced similar working documents on measures to reduce micro particles at wastewater treatment plants (to support OSPAR Marine Litter Action 42) and measures to reduce underwater noise. Since these documents are internal working documents, they are not published.